Proof! I Have Proof!

16 comments April 8th, 2005at 08:28pm Posted by Eli

Ha! I told you I have eyes! Ha! Posted by Hello

Entry Filed under: Favorites,People,Photoblogging


  • 1. V  |  April 8th, 2005 at 8:33 pm

    That is a very nice picture. The photographer is a genius.

  • 2. Eli  |  April 8th, 2005 at 8:33 pm

    Is all about having the sexy gorgeous subject matter.

  • 3. NYMary  |  April 8th, 2005 at 10:32 pm

    You look so disappointed. Were you adjusting to the news that Netflix does not have Exorcist 4?

    Thanks for the Nick Cave!

  • 4. Eli  |  April 8th, 2005 at 10:41 pm

    I only have the three facial expressions. The other two are “grim” and “cranky”.

  • 5. Thersites  |  April 8th, 2005 at 10:48 pm

    I have eyes too.

    Bette Davis eyes.

  • 6. Charlotte Smith  |  April 8th, 2005 at 11:01 pm

    You, sir, are a handsome devil. Rrrrow!

  • 7. ntodd  |  April 8th, 2005 at 11:06 pm

    Those aren’t eyes. Those are organic cameras obscura…

  • 8. oldwhitelady  |  April 9th, 2005 at 1:47 am

    What a handsome gentleman. Who is that, again? What’s his phone number?

    Nice photo, Eli!

  • 9. Jeffraham Prestonian  |  April 9th, 2005 at 4:13 am

    thersites: I have eyes too.

    Bette Davis eyes.

    I have Marty Feldman eyes.

    G’night, boonmats!

  • 10. Ripley  |  April 9th, 2005 at 5:36 am

    Eli, I think I speak for all of us when I say…

    I’m bluer than blue
    Sadder than sad
    You’re the only life
    This empty room has ever had

    I just need a moment…hug?

  • 11. Eli  |  April 9th, 2005 at 5:37 pm

    Thanks, Charlotte & OWL.

    Ripley: C’mere, you.

  • 12. Spear and Magic  |  April 9th, 2005 at 11:08 pm

    I know it’s common practice to post early, youthful photos on the web, Eli, but the Nixon/Agnew button really gives you away on this one. Does this photo date from the 1968 campaign or the 1972?

    Unless you want us all thinking that you’re really in your 60s, you’re either going to have to post a photo of yourself (with eyes!) holding a recent newspaper, or else point out something in this posted photo that wasn’t around before Watergate.

  • 13. Eli  |  April 9th, 2005 at 11:28 pm

    Nice try, S&M, but you are overlooking the non-sooty Pittsburgh sky behind me, proving that this photo must date from the mid-80s at the earliest.

  • 14. Spear and Magic  |  April 10th, 2005 at 12:49 am

    Ah, you’ve got me there. Plus I see blurry blue street signs behind you, near the streetlights. Pittsburgh didn’t get those until Sophie Masloff had them put up in the late ’80s early ’90s. Apparently before that, street signs were few and far between. Pittsburgh is hard enough as it is to navigate–imagine it without reliable signage!

  • 15. Eli  |  April 10th, 2005 at 12:50 am

    Pittsburgh has reliable signage? Where?

  • 16. Anonymous  |  April 10th, 2005 at 7:44 pm

    Neat pic, Eli!
    Helga from down under

Contact Eli



Most Recent Posts




April 2005
« Mar   May »

Thinking Blogger

Pittsburgh Webloggers

Site Meter

View My Stats *