<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freedom Is On The Moonwalk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://multi-medium.net/2005/08/05/freedom-is-on-the-moonwalk/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://multi-medium.net/2005/08/05/freedom-is-on-the-moonwalk</link>
	<description>I'm full of tinier media!</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Multi Medium &#187; The Multi Medium Manifesto</title>
		<link>http://multi-medium.net/2005/08/05/freedom-is-on-the-moonwalk#comment-5731</link>
		<dc:creator>Multi Medium &#187; The Multi Medium Manifesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multi-medium.net/2005/08/05/freedom-is-on-the-moonwalk/#comment-5731</guid>
		<description>[...] 1.2. The Democrats should push loudly for election reform, stressing the democracy (&#8221;Everyone should have the right to vote&#8221;) and legitimacy aspects (&#8221;Americans need to know that their votes count, and that our leaders are fairly elected&#8221;). Force the Republicans to defend the indefensible. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1.2. The Democrats should push loudly for election reform, stressing the democracy (&#8221;Everyone should have the right to vote&#8221;) and legitimacy aspects (&#8221;Americans need to know that their votes count, and that our leaders are fairly elected&#8221;). Force the Republicans to defend the indefensible. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Multi Medium &#187; They Get E-Mails</title>
		<link>http://multi-medium.net/2005/08/05/freedom-is-on-the-moonwalk#comment-5653</link>
		<dc:creator>Multi Medium &#187; They Get E-Mails</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 01:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multi-medium.net/2005/08/05/freedom-is-on-the-moonwalk/#comment-5653</guid>
		<description>[...] Swim/Hope at Deep Confusion has a lengthy post up about the importance of electoral reform, which is a subject near and dear to my heart. The Democratic party has frustrated and infuriated me with its complacent passivity about election reform; yeah, I&#8217;m sort of dimly aware that they&#8217;re working on it behind the scenes, but where&#8217;s the urgency? Where&#8217;s the passion? Why aren&#8217;t they making a big deal about this and forcing the Republicans to defend their antidemocratic position? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Swim/Hope at Deep Confusion has a lengthy post up about the importance of electoral reform, which is a subject near and dear to my heart. The Democratic party has frustrated and infuriated me with its complacent passivity about election reform; yeah, I&#8217;m sort of dimly aware that they&#8217;re working on it behind the scenes, but where&#8217;s the urgency? Where&#8217;s the passion? Why aren&#8217;t they making a big deal about this and forcing the Republicans to defend their antidemocratic position? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Multi Medium &#187; Apparently Some Congresscritters Get It</title>
		<link>http://multi-medium.net/2005/08/05/freedom-is-on-the-moonwalk#comment-5615</link>
		<dc:creator>Multi Medium &#187; Apparently Some Congresscritters Get It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 03:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multi-medium.net/2005/08/05/freedom-is-on-the-moonwalk/#comment-5615</guid>
		<description>[...] Well. Based on today&#8217;s E.J. Dionne column, it looks like Rush Holt may be reading my blog. I do not pretend to know how large a threat [electronic vote tampering] is. I do know that it&#8217;s a threat to democracy when so many Americans doubt that their votes will be recorded accurately. And I also know that smart, computer-savvy people are concerned about these machines. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well. Based on today&#8217;s E.J. Dionne column, it looks like Rush Holt may be reading my blog. I do not pretend to know how large a threat [electronic vote tampering] is. I do know that it&#8217;s a threat to democracy when so many Americans doubt that their votes will be recorded accurately. And I also know that smart, computer-savvy people are concerned about these machines. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://multi-medium.net/2005/08/05/freedom-is-on-the-moonwalk#comment-1288</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 23:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multi-medium.net/2005/08/05/freedom-is-on-the-moonwalk/#comment-1288</guid>
		<description>I have no problem at all with optical scan ballots; I don't even mind touchscreen voting *if* it has a paper trail.  I'm all in favor of being able to count votes quickly.

BUT, it *must* be possible to recount the votes by hand at any time; in fact, I'd like to see exit poll discrepancies as one of the triggers for hand recounts.

Bottom line, though: Paperless electronic voting that can't be hand-counted is an *invitation* to fraud, because it's so damn easy to get away with it.  I think the Republicans would think twice about trying to rig electronic voting if they thought there was any chance they could get busted at it.  I'd like to think that would permanently destroy their credibility, but they shrug off credibility-destroying fiascoes on an almost daily basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no problem at all with optical scan ballots; I don&#8217;t even mind touchscreen voting *if* it has a paper trail.  I&#8217;m all in favor of being able to count votes quickly.</p>
<p>BUT, it *must* be possible to recount the votes by hand at any time; in fact, I&#8217;d like to see exit poll discrepancies as one of the triggers for hand recounts.</p>
<p>Bottom line, though: Paperless electronic voting that can&#8217;t be hand-counted is an *invitation* to fraud, because it&#8217;s so damn easy to get away with it.  I think the Republicans would think twice about trying to rig electronic voting if they thought there was any chance they could get busted at it.  I&#8217;d like to think that would permanently destroy their credibility, but they shrug off credibility-destroying fiascoes on an almost daily basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ol&#39; Froth</title>
		<link>http://multi-medium.net/2005/08/05/freedom-is-on-the-moonwalk#comment-1287</link>
		<dc:creator>Ol&#39; Froth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multi-medium.net/2005/08/05/freedom-is-on-the-moonwalk/#comment-1287</guid>
		<description>Good post, Eli, that is an issue we should push.  I can't see how anyone can argue against having a verifiable paper trail.  That said, high-speed vote counting, which is what push-button, optical scanning, and yes, punch cards are all about, benefits only one group, and it is not the people:  It is the MEDIA, who love high speed ballot counting, because it lends drama to election night, and is usually concluded by the time most of us go to bed.  Pre-packaged for a consumer audiance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, Eli, that is an issue we should push.  I can&#8217;t see how anyone can argue against having a verifiable paper trail.  That said, high-speed vote counting, which is what push-button, optical scanning, and yes, punch cards are all about, benefits only one group, and it is not the people:  It is the MEDIA, who love high speed ballot counting, because it lends drama to election night, and is usually concluded by the time most of us go to bed.  Pre-packaged for a consumer audiance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
