The Trouble With Competence

3 comments September 11th, 2005at 08:09pm Posted by Eli

Just another one of those posts where I want to, shall we say, formalize something I’ve been saying in the Eschaton comments.

The catastrophe in Louisiana and Mississippi has served to shine a glaring spotlight on the rot of incompetence at the Bush administration’s core. It is painfully clear that “Brownie” was woefully unqualified to run FEMA, and attained the position solely because he is a Friend Of Bush, as did his predecessor and his immediate subordinates. This is typically attributed to corruption and unseriousness about the important business of governing, but I don’t think that tells quite the entire story of why competence is like kryptonite for the Bush administration.

To put it simply, competence gets in the way of loyalty. (Or at least, loyalty in its most cramped and narrow yes-man sense) Competence requires at least a passing familiarity with reality, which is sometimes not what the boss wants it to be. If the boss cannot accept anything that does not fit in with his worldview, then the competent employee will inevitably come into conflict with the boss’s agenda. And the farther from reality the boss is, the more frequent such conflicts will be. So if the boss’s priority is to employ people who won’t rock the boat or tell him anything he doesn’t want to hear, then he will naturally turn to those who have always agreed with him in the past, who make him feel comfortable.

Now, of course, a real leader does not fear competence – a real leader welcomes competence and alternative viewpoints to his own, and uses them to make himself stronger. But, needless to say, President Bush is not a real leader, and surrounding himself with people who tell him he is only makes him less of one.

Entry Filed under: Bush,Corruption/Cronyism,Favorites,Katrina,Republicans,Wankers

3 Comments

  • 1. Multi Medium » Feit&hellip  |  May 27th, 2007 at 10:29 am

    […] About two years ago, I wrote a post about the conflict between loyalty and competence, especially in BushCo.  Monica Goodling’s hiring practices at DOJ are one example of this principle in action, but this one might be even more shocking: At a recent forum, career U.S. intelligence officer Patrick Lang recounted a job interview he had with neocon war architect Douglas Feith. Lang, who had previously run the Pentagon’s world-wide spying operations, “was put forward as somebody who would be good at running the Pentagon’s office of special operations and low-intensity warfare, i.e., counterinsurgency.” So he was interviewed by Feith: “He was sitting there munching a sandwich while he was talking to me,” Lang recalled, “which I thought was remarkable in itself, but he also had these briefing papers — they always had briefing papers, you know — about me. […]

  • 2. Multi Medium » Bett&hellip  |  September 6th, 2007 at 7:55 am

    […] winning handily every time.  It’s very similar (and related) to the conflict between loyalty and competence, with the exact same […]

  • 3. redareibm  |  May 8th, 2008 at 1:37 am

    my with a School with box managed


Contact Eli





Feeds

Linkedelia!

Most Recent Posts

Archives

Categories

Calendar

September 2005
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  


Thinking Blogger

Pittsburgh Webloggers

Site Meter


View My Stats *