Stupid Political Question

3 comments November 2nd, 2006at 05:58pm Posted by Eli

If, God forbid, the Democrats pick up “only” 4 or 5 Senate seats and, say, 15 or 16 House seats, will the Republicans and the media have the gall to frame it as a huge victory for the Republicans and another “mandate” for President Bush, rather than a clear repudiation and a bullet dodged?

I’m guessing that the November 8th narrative will be “Narrowly avoiding total electoral catastrophe can only be good for the Republicans!”, but hopefully I won’t get the chance to be proven wrong.

Entry Filed under: Media,Politics

3 Comments

  • 1. charley  |  November 3rd, 2006 at 1:22 am

    i think you know the answer to that.

  • 2. spocko  |  November 3rd, 2006 at 7:14 am

    Yes. Total control of both houses can only be good for the GOP.

    Why?

    It will make them “hungry” again. And a hungry GOP is actually good for the “News” business because they will need to do something exciting and scandalous to regain power and when they do the press will be there to support ^H^H^H^H^H report on it.

    To the press it means more and better scandals dug up or made up by Rovians. Democrats have more “good” sex scandals like blowjobs and straight hetero sex, nothing icky like man on boy or man on dog. I mean they are “proud” of their gays, which just drives the republican’s batty.

  • 3. Eli  |  November 3rd, 2006 at 7:18 am

    Well, yeah, obviously retaining control of Congress is better than losing it. But in terms of the election itself, would they be able to spin a near-miss as a victory? I mean, losing 4-5 Senate seats and 15 House seats is not exactly what you would call a positive message from the electorate. But I suspect the media will…


Contact Eli





Feeds

Linkedelia!

Most Recent Posts

Archives

Categories

Calendar

November 2006
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  


Thinking Blogger

Pittsburgh Webloggers

Site Meter


View My Stats *