Okay, So…

1 comment January 23rd, 2007at 09:41pm Posted by Eli

If Libby’s defense strategy is to claim that the Bushies are making Libby a scapegoat to protect Rove…

What kind of proof do they have to provide to make that case? Would it be enough to get Rover indicted?

And as a special bonus, it looks like both the prosecution and the defense are portraying Cheney as the Grand Puppetmaster orchestrating the leakage. Mwahahahaha.

Entry Filed under: Bush,Cheney,Libby/Plame,Politics,Rove,Wankers

1 Comment

  • 1. Multi Medium » Defe&hellip  |  January 25th, 2007 at 12:04 pm

    […] To follow up on an earlier post, I am curious as to just how a “scapegoat” defense will work in a perjury/obstruction case. Is there any way to argue that Rove somehow set Libby up to look like he was lying and obstructing, when in reality it was Rove? Or are they going to argue that Libby only did so because he was ordered to cover Rove’s ass? […]


Contact Eli





Feeds

Linkedelia!

Most Recent Posts

Archives

Categories

Calendar

January 2007
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  


Thinking Blogger

Pittsburgh Webloggers

Site Meter


View My Stats *