<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What I&#8217;ve Been Sayin&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://multi-medium.net/2007/02/16/what-ive-been-sayin/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://multi-medium.net/2007/02/16/what-ive-been-sayin</link>
	<description>I'm full of tinier media!</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Multi Medium &#187; Dances With Masks</title>
		<link>http://multi-medium.net/2007/02/16/what-ive-been-sayin#comment-6113</link>
		<dc:creator>Multi Medium &#187; Dances With Masks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 19:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multi-medium.net/2007/02/16/what-ive-been-sayin/#comment-6113</guid>
		<description>[...] The Edwards fiasco, and Glenn Greenwald&#8217;s recent echoing of my observation that the Republicans do not appear to be very serious about what they claim to be serious about both highlight something that I&#8217;m very frustrated about. What&#8217;s bugging me is that, with a few exceptions, the Democrats always take everything the Republicans say at face value, rather than as cynical political manipulation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Edwards fiasco, and Glenn Greenwald&#8217;s recent echoing of my observation that the Republicans do not appear to be very serious about what they claim to be serious about both highlight something that I&#8217;m very frustrated about. What&#8217;s bugging me is that, with a few exceptions, the Democrats always take everything the Republicans say at face value, rather than as cynical political manipulation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://multi-medium.net/2007/02/16/what-ive-been-sayin#comment-6096</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 23:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multi-medium.net/2007/02/16/what-ive-been-sayin/#comment-6096</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Sun!  Too bad my photo galleries are broken at the moment.

I think it's telling that no-one wants to be out in front presenting the fake evidence this time around.

Al Qaeda, Iraq, Iran, none of them were ever even *close* to being an existential threat, except in the sense that they may cause the U.S. to commit suicide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Sun!  Too bad my photo galleries are broken at the moment.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s telling that no-one wants to be out in front presenting the fake evidence this time around.</p>
<p>Al Qaeda, Iraq, Iran, none of them were ever even *close* to being an existential threat, except in the sense that they may cause the U.S. to commit suicide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunrunner</title>
		<link>http://multi-medium.net/2007/02/16/what-ive-been-sayin#comment-6095</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunrunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 23:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multi-medium.net/2007/02/16/what-ive-been-sayin/#comment-6095</guid>
		<description>Gorgeous new site Eli!!!!!

I remember watching Colin Powelll's presentation for the case to invade Iraq on TV &#38; thiniking that his *evidence* did not seem all that convincing.  But I was also paying close attention to El Baradi, and well, he did make sense, in that they had not found convincing evidence that Saddam was capable of unleashing a nuclear or chemical nightmare on the US.

But even if Iraq had been in possession of chemical or nuclear weapons, it still did not make sense to go to war.  After all, what nasty weapons they did have could not've held a candle to what the Soviets had held, and they were successfully held at bay with MADD (a Republican strategy btw).

Shorter version, you cannot convince me that Al Quaeda types are more of a military threat than the old Soviet Union was.  Or even pre-WW II Japan, for that matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gorgeous new site Eli!!!!!</p>
<p>I remember watching Colin Powelll&#8217;s presentation for the case to invade Iraq on TV &amp; thiniking that his *evidence* did not seem all that convincing.  But I was also paying close attention to El Baradi, and well, he did make sense, in that they had not found convincing evidence that Saddam was capable of unleashing a nuclear or chemical nightmare on the US.</p>
<p>But even if Iraq had been in possession of chemical or nuclear weapons, it still did not make sense to go to war.  After all, what nasty weapons they did have could not&#8217;ve held a candle to what the Soviets had held, and they were successfully held at bay with MADD (a Republican strategy btw).</p>
<p>Shorter version, you cannot convince me that Al Quaeda types are more of a military threat than the old Soviet Union was.  Or even pre-WW II Japan, for that matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://multi-medium.net/2007/02/16/what-ive-been-sayin#comment-6094</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multi-medium.net/2007/02/16/what-ive-been-sayin/#comment-6094</guid>
		<description>Preachin' to the choir, Rob.  I've ranted repeatedly about the Republicans' valuing the financial comfort of the nuke and chem industries over national security.

Ditto for shredding the Constitution: like Iraq and probably Iran, it's something that was on the agenda all along, and 9/11 just made it possible for the crazies to finally realize their fever dreams.

And the "starve-the-beast" approach to taxes and government has been around for a lot longer than Bush's presidency.  I also share your concern about a Democratic president getting left holding the bag, and bearing the brunt of the national backlash against the unpopular policies that will be needed to put the country back together again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preachin&#8217; to the choir, Rob.  I&#8217;ve ranted repeatedly about the Republicans&#8217; valuing the financial comfort of the nuke and chem industries over national security.</p>
<p>Ditto for shredding the Constitution: like Iraq and probably Iran, it&#8217;s something that was on the agenda all along, and 9/11 just made it possible for the crazies to finally realize their fever dreams.</p>
<p>And the &#8220;starve-the-beast&#8221; approach to taxes and government has been around for a lot longer than Bush&#8217;s presidency.  I also share your concern about a Democratic president getting left holding the bag, and bearing the brunt of the national backlash against the unpopular policies that will be needed to put the country back together again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://multi-medium.net/2007/02/16/what-ive-been-sayin#comment-6093</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multi-medium.net/2007/02/16/what-ive-been-sayin/#comment-6093</guid>
		<description>Lately, I posted about the &lt;a href="http://www.unspace.net/2007/01/nuclear-regulatory-commission-ignores-radwaste-storage-problem/" rel="nofollow"&gt;completely idiotic decision the Bush administration made w.r.t. nuclear power&lt;/a&gt;.

The whole thing is, the gutting of the Constitution was on their agenda before 9/11, but not to target foreign terrorists but rather  Americans. The whole terrorism thing is an excuse.

Does anyone remember, back when Bush became President, some claimed a "good idea" would be to run up the budget to the point that we HAD to cut back on social programs and enforcing civil rights and protecting the environment? I think the Bush admin has done a wonderful job of that. Just in time for a Democratic President comes the budget catastrophe requiring painful cuts in social programs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lately, I posted about the <a href="http://www.unspace.net/2007/01/nuclear-regulatory-commission-ignores-radwaste-storage-problem/" rel="nofollow">completely idiotic decision the Bush administration made w.r.t. nuclear power</a>.</p>
<p>The whole thing is, the gutting of the Constitution was on their agenda before 9/11, but not to target foreign terrorists but rather  Americans. The whole terrorism thing is an excuse.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember, back when Bush became President, some claimed a &#8220;good idea&#8221; would be to run up the budget to the point that we HAD to cut back on social programs and enforcing civil rights and protecting the environment? I think the Bush admin has done a wonderful job of that. Just in time for a Democratic President comes the budget catastrophe requiring painful cuts in social programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://multi-medium.net/2007/02/16/what-ive-been-sayin#comment-6092</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multi-medium.net/2007/02/16/what-ive-been-sayin/#comment-6092</guid>
		<description>Fear + Lack Of Dissent = POWER!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fear + Lack Of Dissent = POWER!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charley</title>
		<link>http://multi-medium.net/2007/02/16/what-ive-been-sayin#comment-6091</link>
		<dc:creator>charley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multi-medium.net/2007/02/16/what-ive-been-sayin/#comment-6091</guid>
		<description>that guy who wrote Black Hawk Down had some salient comments about this on tweet's show yesterday.

quite obviously the whole plan since 9/11 has been to rachet up the tension, and wire down the dissent.

well, it's obvious to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that guy who wrote Black Hawk Down had some salient comments about this on tweet&#8217;s show yesterday.</p>
<p>quite obviously the whole plan since 9/11 has been to rachet up the tension, and wire down the dissent.</p>
<p>well, it&#8217;s obvious to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://multi-medium.net/2007/02/16/what-ive-been-sayin#comment-6088</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multi-medium.net/2007/02/16/what-ive-been-sayin/#comment-6088</guid>
		<description>The Democrats have an abundance of material, really.  But they use only a small fraction of it.  They really need to use the more telling and undeniable stuff like this and Donohue/obscene death threats against the Republicans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democrats have an abundance of material, really.  But they use only a small fraction of it.  They really need to use the more telling and undeniable stuff like this and Donohue/obscene death threats against the Republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karmicjay</title>
		<link>http://multi-medium.net/2007/02/16/what-ive-been-sayin#comment-6086</link>
		<dc:creator>karmicjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multi-medium.net/2007/02/16/what-ive-been-sayin/#comment-6086</guid>
		<description>Ya, One can only pray they do. You sire have been quiet prescient I have to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya, One can only pray they do. You sire have been quiet prescient I have to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
