Great Moments In Dubyatalk

1 comment May 24th, 2007at 03:00pm Posted by Eli

Breaking News: Bin Laden determined to strike at U.S. reporters’ children!

At today’s presser, President Bush told reporters that lack of support for his policies would put their own children in danger:

Asked by NBC’s David Gregory why anyone should view him as credible on the war, Bush gave an answer that included this about the terrorists:

“They are a threat to your children, David.”

And in response to The New York Times‘s Jim Rutenberg, who asked why Bin Laden is still at large, Bush gave an answer that included this about terrorism:

“It’s a danger to your children, Jim.”

I’m a better daddy-protector than you are — now that’ll make ’em think again about asking tough questions! If you do, the Prez names you on national TV, suggests he understands the threat to your own kids better than you do. Sadder and sadder…

…oh, and I know Rutenberg, he doesn’t have kids, Mr. President.

So… in response to a question about why he hasn’t caught the world’s #1 terrorist, Dubya says that terrorism is a threat to Rutenberg’s nonexistent children? Is he saying that he actually hates children and wants the terrorists to get them, or just reporters’ children? After all, the fewer reporters there are in the world, the better it is for Republicans.

Also, if your non-nonexistent children are eligible for military service, then I would submit to you that the preznit is a much bigger threat to them than terrorism will ever be.

Entry Filed under: Bush,Media,Terrorism,Wankers

1 Comment

  • 1. PoiShifter  |  May 24th, 2007 at 6:40 pm

    At this point, I think Bush is more of a threat to their children than Bin Laden. Especially if their kids are nearing 18…

Contact Eli



Most Recent Posts




May 2007
« Apr   Jun »

Thinking Blogger

Pittsburgh Webloggers

Site Meter

View My Stats *