<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Wanker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://multi-medium.net/2007/07/03/another-wanker/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://multi-medium.net/2007/07/03/another-wanker</link>
	<description>I'm full of tinier media!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vacantwater</title>
		<link>http://multi-medium.net/2007/07/03/another-wanker/comment-page-1#comment-89895</link>
		<dc:creator>vacantwater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 18:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multi-medium.net/2007/07/03/another-wanker/#comment-89895</guid>
		<description>magnificent wasn't at his bellowed then did on me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>magnificent wasn&#8217;t at his bellowed then did on me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://multi-medium.net/2007/07/03/another-wanker/comment-page-1#comment-27000</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 22:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multi-medium.net/2007/07/03/another-wanker/#comment-27000</guid>
		<description>I'm not even entirely sure that Libby has actually even tried to blackmail anyone.  It may be just as much a matter of taking care of a loyal soldier.

Besides, they don't want to set a precedent where if you break the law on behalf of a Republican president, you might go to prison.  Best to just nip that idea right in the bud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not even entirely sure that Libby has actually even tried to blackmail anyone.  It may be just as much a matter of taking care of a loyal soldier.</p>
<p>Besides, they don&#8217;t want to set a precedent where if you break the law on behalf of a Republican president, you might go to prison.  Best to just nip that idea right in the bud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoliShifter</title>
		<link>http://multi-medium.net/2007/07/03/another-wanker/comment-page-1#comment-26962</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliShifter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 18:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multi-medium.net/2007/07/03/another-wanker/#comment-26962</guid>
		<description>It's absolutely sickening how republicans, conservatives, so-called Independents too embarassed to call themselves Republicans are behaving.

They keep trying to claim the Libby case was no bid deal.  We're dealing with treason and the outing of a CIA agent to which their reply is "Plame was a desk jockey".  Well if she was a desk jockey, then how was she powerful enough to get Joe Wilson sent to Niger in the first place?

I heard the founder of world nut daily on Thom Hartmann today scream "why didn't they go after Armitage, he admited he was the leaker!"

Well the reason is because LIBBY OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE!  Fitzgerald couldn't get to Armitage, Cheney, or Bush because Libby acted as the firewall.

Our conservative friends seem to forget that.

The big question on my mind is what does Libby know that has Bush and Cheney jumping through hoops for him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s absolutely sickening how republicans, conservatives, so-called Independents too embarassed to call themselves Republicans are behaving.</p>
<p>They keep trying to claim the Libby case was no bid deal.  We&#8217;re dealing with treason and the outing of a CIA agent to which their reply is &#8220;Plame was a desk jockey&#8221;.  Well if she was a desk jockey, then how was she powerful enough to get Joe Wilson sent to Niger in the first place?</p>
<p>I heard the founder of world nut daily on Thom Hartmann today scream &#8220;why didn&#8217;t they go after Armitage, he admited he was the leaker!&#8221;</p>
<p>Well the reason is because LIBBY OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE!  Fitzgerald couldn&#8217;t get to Armitage, Cheney, or Bush because Libby acted as the firewall.</p>
<p>Our conservative friends seem to forget that.</p>
<p>The big question on my mind is what does Libby know that has Bush and Cheney jumping through hoops for him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
