Archive for July 31st, 2007

We’re Off To See The Lizard…

Forget the Geico Cavemen, it’s the lizard brain that’s hot now.

Drew Westen in Sunday’s WaPo:

For much of the last 40 years, Democrats have ignored their guts and searched for the best facts and figures. But the most compelling fact is that during those 40 years, only one Democrat has been reelected to the presidency. Bill Clinton was also the only Democrat who intuitively understood that the best appeals seize people with something emotionally compelling, lay out the alternatives posed by the candidates and “close the argument” with inspiration or outrage.


The philosopher David Hume had it right: Reason is the slave to the passions, not the other way around. Recognizing the primacy of passion in everything we do has profound implications for politics. Reason is the middle manager in decision making, not the CEO. Policies are nothing but the frontmen for values. You listen to the middleman’s “pitch,” but you go straight to the top when it’s time to choose. You go, in other words, to your emotions — particularly your moral emotions — when you pull a lever in the voting booth.


Why is it almost always unwise to “refuse to dignify” a political attack? Because of the way our brains function. Our brains are nothing but vast networks of interconnected neurons, which join thoughts, images, sounds, memories and emotions. Why did Clinton have to disavow the label of “liberal” in last week’s debate, even though she explained the term’s noble derivation? Because conservatives understand how to make associations stick, and they have so thoroughly contaminated the neural networks in American minds that define what it means to be a liberal that even Jefferson couldn’t win an election today if he called himself one — which he did, liberally.

If the other side is trashing you and you say nothing or back down, you cede to your adversaries the neural networks that constitute public opinion….

And Benedict Carey in today’s NYT Science News:

New studies have found that people tidy up more thoroughly when there’s a faint tang of cleaning liquid in the air; they become more competitive if there’s a briefcase in sight, or more cooperative if they glimpse words like “dependable” and “support” — all without being aware of the change, or what prompted it.Psychologists say that “priming” people in this way is not some form of hypnotism, or even subliminal seduction; rather, it’s a demonstration of how everyday sights, smells and sounds can selectively activate goals or motives that people already have.

More fundamentally, the new studies reveal a subconscious brain that is far more active, purposeful and independent than previously known. Goals, whether to eat, mate or devour an iced latte, are like neural software programs that can only be run one at a time, and the unconscious is perfectly capable of running the program it chooses.


“When it comes to our behavior from moment to moment, the big question is, ‘What to do next?’ ” said John A. Bargh, a professor of psychology at Yale and a co-author, with Lawrence Williams, of the coffee study, which was presented at a recent psychology conference. “Well, we’re finding that we have these unconscious behavioral guidance systems that are continually furnishing suggestions through the day about what to do next, and the brain is considering and often acting on those, all before conscious awareness.”


This bottom-up order makes sense from an evolutionary perspective. The subcortical areas of the brain evolved first and would have had to help individuals fight, flee and scavenge well before conscious, distinctly human layers were added later in evolutionary history. In this sense, Dr. Bargh argues, unconscious goals can be seen as open-ended, adaptive agents acting on behalf of the broad, genetically encoded aims – automatic survival systems.


And researchers do not yet know how or when, exactly, unconscious drives may suddenly become conscious; or under which circumstances people are able to override hidden urges by force of will. Millions have quit smoking, for instance, and uncounted numbers have resisted darker urges to misbehave that they don’t even fully understand.

Yet the new research on priming makes it clear that we are not alone in our own consciousness. We have company, an invisible partner who has strong reactions about the world that don’t always agree with our own, but whose instincts, these studies clearly show, are at least as likely to be helpful, and attentive to others, as they are to be disruptive.

I think these two threads may be converging, as both parties attempt to bypass that pesky cerebral cortex. I’m probably just paranoid, but I fear that the Republicans may have already figured out some basic “priming” techniques to make themselves look tough and resolute instead of craven and corrupt (although it definitely seems to be wearing off…). Perhaps the U.S. is doomed to an endstate where the lizard brain reigns supreme.

But as long as we’re heading in that direction, maybe what the Democrats need to do is sneak some cleaning fluid into all the polling places so that voters get the urge to clean up our government. Or maybe they need to hire this guy:

Now that’s what I call priming!

(h/t to the shadowy and mysterious Codename V. for the Derren Brown clip)

1 comment July 31st, 2007 at 10:37pm Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Politics,Science

Mark The Date

Richard Cohen writes a column that doesn’t make me want to throw things! As a matter of fact, I agree with him on the whole entire thing, and I think the distinction between the right to keep guns at home vs. the right to carry guns around in public is a very important one. (I’m not real enthusiastic about either, but the former is a lot less likely to result in people killed by stupidity.)

2 comments July 31st, 2007 at 11:45am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Elections,Media,Politics,Republicans

NY Jets Have The Big Mo’ On Their Side

And by “Mo'”, of course I mean “Mozart”:

Instead of blasting hip-hop, rap and hard rock on their sideline speakers at Hofstra, a tradition that began last summer with the arrival of innovative coach Eric Mangini, the Jets have altered their play list, mixing in classical music-namely Mozart-with their old standbys.

It makes for an almost surreal setting: 300-pound men crashing into each other, with gentle melodies in the background. It’s a ballet of behemoths.

The ever-meticulous Mangini, always looking for a psychological or physical edge, isn’t playing classical music to entertain the 3,000 or so fans who show up every day to watch practice. There’s a method to his Mozart.

“From different studies, they assume … Mozart’s music and brain waves are very similar, and it stimulates learning,” he said. “They play it in a lot of schools around the country-kind of underneath, very low-so I thought if that’s the case, why not give it a shot?”

Scientists believe that listening to Mozart can help improve concentration and the ability to make intuitive decisions. They say the music helps both sides of the brain to work together. Fourteen years ago, a study revealed a significant increase in college students’ IQs after they listened to Mozart’s “Sonata for Two Pianos in D Major.”


The Jets usually play Mozart during the low-intensity drills, when the team splits up into individual units and the coaches are stressing mental work over physical. In team drills, when the speed picks up, they crank up the music, blasting everything from rock to rap. They do it to simulate crowd noise, forcing the players to increase their concentration amid the ear-splitting din.

It’s no secret what music the players prefer.

“Mozart, Beethoven, guys aren’t feeling that,” linebacker Jonathan Vilma said, smiling. Said defensive end Shaun Ellis: “It kind of puts you to sleep a little bit. I’m not complaining about it. They say it helps learning. As long as we get our music at the end of the day, it’s okay.”


Some experts believe that early childhood exposure to Mozart improves mental development, which explains the growing toy market. Mangini bought Baby Mozart for his two young sons, and it got him thinking about possible benefits on the football field. Not everyone is convinced that it has a benefit.

“It’s a very intriguing question,” said John Murray, a Florida-based sports psychologist. “My hat’s off to the coach for being creative, but I’m hesitant to take a strong stand either way. If it’s not pleasurable for the players, it’s not a good working environment.”

He paused.

“Then again,” Murray added, “if the players are upset with Mozart, maybe they’ll get angry and play better.”

Hey, it can’t hurt, can it? Maybe there’ll be a Superbowl showdown with the Tampa Bay Bachaneers.

July 31st, 2007 at 11:35am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Coolness,Music,Sports

What Gives?

I just checked, and Daily Kos is still there. I thought the Great Civility Warrior Bill O’Reilly was going to destroy it?

Oh well, it’s just a matter of time, I suppose – like that death-touch thing in Kill Bill 2 where the victim walks five steps and then dies. Bill O’Reilly is, like, a kung fu master of the airwaves – but with more sexual harassment and shouting.

3 comments July 31st, 2007 at 11:23am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Blogosphere,Media,Republicans,Wankers

Coney Island Pirateblogging

Ahhhrrr, matey! ‘Tis Pirates Of The, um, Mid-Atlantic.

* WPG2 Plugin Not Validated *
This guy is just kinda sad-looking, really.

* WPG2 Plugin Not Validated *
If you ever wondered what Howdy Doody would look like as a pirate…

* WPG2 Plugin Not Validated *
You cannot tell me this guy did not get beat up constantly by the other pirates.

July 31st, 2007 at 07:32am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Coney Island,NJ/NYC,Photoblogging

Contact Eli



Most Recent Posts




July 2007
« Jun   Aug »

Thinking Blogger

Pittsburgh Webloggers

Site Meter

View My Stats *