Archive for August 16th, 2007

What I Been Saying

Nitpicker would like to see Democrats stop apologizing every time the Republicans start howling with fake outrage.

Amen to that. Amen.

August 16th, 2007 at 09:54pm Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Democrats,Politics,Republicans


Repulsive. Absolutely repulsive and scary.

Niewert must take at least five showers every day. With a steel wool loofah.

August 16th, 2007 at 08:24pm Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Racism

Thought For The Day

If the Devils updated their team uniform, that would mean they’d have a new New Jersey jersey.

Just thought I should point that out.

2 comments August 16th, 2007 at 02:34pm Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Puns,Sports


Hey, good news, everybody! The president isn’t important!

How much does the President of the United States really matter?


Think of it this way. Let’s assume that you think a given President is the worst in recent memory, or even in history. Then ask yourself to list the things for which he is directly or indirectly responsible.

It’s probably not hard to come up with a long list, especially with the current President. He is, after all, extremely unpopular. Almost everyone’s list would start with the war in Iraq and then, depending on your political and personal persuasion, would include variables like Supreme Court nominations, energy policy, the U.S.’ standing in the world, trouble in the housing and credit markets, etc.

Now stop for a minute and think about your favorite president in recent history. If you are a Bush hater, maybe you want to think about Bill Clinton. Now list all the things for which Clinton was directly or indirectly responsible that you liked a great deal, and that really affected you on a daily basis.

There are some notable exceptions to my argument: if you have a family member fighting in Afghanistan or Iraq, it’s impossible not to attribute his or her presence there to a decision made by the President. But on many other fronts, I would argue that the President’s impact is significantly overestimated. Does he nominate judges, try to effect legislation and move the economy, and set the tone for relationships with other countries? Absolutely. But for every Presidential action, there are a million strong reactions waiting to occur.

I would argue that it’s worth thinking about our system of democratic capitalism as a market like many others, not so different from the stock market. These are complex, dynamic systems in which one decision triggers many others, in which an equilibrium is constantly being sought, in which sudden movements up or down are interpreted as catastrophic in the short run but which prove, in the long run, to be minor corrections in a fairly stable system that’s organically evolving.

As for the economy itself: even though there is debate over the President’s effect on matters affecting people on a daily basis – gas and food prices, interest rates and the housing market – most economists agree that he is more of a cheerleader in this regard than a playmaker.

So why do we attribute so much power to the person in charge?

The Scottish philosopher Thomas Carlyle, in his fascinating and unsettling book On Heroes, Hero-Worship and the Heroic in History, embraced what has come to be known as the “Great Man Theory.” His view was, essentially, that history is blessed now and then by a rare heroic person who is born to lead and without whom our civilization would crumble. It is as anti-market a view as you could conceive. Personally, I find this idea a bit depressing, though I do acknowledge the common psychological need for a strong father or mother figure, for someone to stand tall and protect us, assure us, and take responsibility – even though, except in extremely rare cases (Hitler comes to mind), it is irrational to think that any one person can be responsible for the actions of millions.

Still, I think I’m in the minority. Americans’ widespread belief in the President’s absolute power – love him or hate him – is proof that the Great Man theory is alive and well. My simple argument is that this belief, as emotionally appealing as it may be, is not founded on truth.

But just pretend for a minute that you do agree with me. If you do happen to dislike the current President, this is really good news, since he probably affects your life a lot less than you fear.

Unfortunately, it’s also really bad news, because if you are hoping that a new President will swoop in and fix everything, that’s not going to happen.

Well, I guess if you think stuff like wars, torture, domestic spying, international relations, the environment/global warming, food safety, worker safety, disaster response, the judiciary, separation of powers, and the politicization (and basic competence) of government are minor, and that the president has no effect on the economy at all (I guess Clinton was just lucky, and the Bushes were unlucky, right?), then I guess maybe they have a point. But even if you grant that the president has little effect on the economy, that’s an awfully narrow view.

Maybe all a “good” president has to do is not actively fuck things up – a ficas tree would be a huge improvement over what we have now.

(h/t Adam Conner)

3 comments August 16th, 2007 at 11:50am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Bush,Economy,Media,Wankers

Mostly B&W Downtown NYC Photoblogging

More photos from beautiful downtown Manhattan:

* WPG2 Plugin Not Validated *
NYC’s Vietnam memorial, made up of bricks of frosted, barely-translucent glass (I wanted to get a picture of the sun shining through it, but the glass was too impenetrable).

* WPG2 Plugin Not Validated *
Um, a metal awning.

* WPG2 Plugin Not Validated *
A light, and a chain. Look, I don’t even really need to be here, do I…

* WPG2 Plugin Not Validated *
Sky, traffic lights, construction. All the elements you need for a Quality Photograph.

August 16th, 2007 at 11:35am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: NJ/NYC,Photoblogging

Contact Eli



Most Recent Posts




August 2007
« Jul   Sep »

Thinking Blogger

Pittsburgh Webloggers

Site Meter

View My Stats *