Archive for July 17th, 2008

Linus Vs. The Security Circus

The creator of Linux is fed up with the obsession over security:

In an email to the Linux kernel developer mailing list, Torvalds said a section of the security industry was dedicated to finding bugs in software only to publicize their findings and gain notoriety.

The row erupted in the Gmane mailing list after a developer for the PaX Team, which patches the Linux kernel, accused Torvalds and other top Linux kernel developers of “covering up [the] security impact of bugs” by not clearly labeling them as security flaws.

Torvalds wrote that disclosing the bug itself was enough, without having to label each individual security flaw. He added that taking the bugs to the “security circus” level only glorified the wrong kind of behavior. “It makes heroes out of security people, as if the people who […] fix normal bugs aren’t as important,” wrote Torvalds.

(…)

“Boring normal bugs are way more important, just because there’s a lot more of them,” wrote Torvalds. “I don’t think some spectacular security hole should be glorified or cared about as being any more ‘special’ than a random spectacular crash due to bad locking,” he said.

The Linux leader went on to state that “security people are often the black-and-white kind of people that I can’t stand”.

(…)

“I think the OpenBSD crowd is a bunch of masturbating monkeys, in that they make such a big deal about concentrating on security to the point where they pretty much admit that nothing else matters to them. To me, security is important. But it’s no less important than everything else that is also important!” Torvalds concluded.

By a remarkable coincidence, “Masturbating Monkey” is actually the title of an upcoming Ubuntu Linux release.

1 comment July 17th, 2008 at 10:16pm Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Technology

Wanker Of The Month

Michael Savage/Weiner:

Now, you want me to tell you my opinion on autism, since I’m not talking about autism? A fraud, a racket. For a long while, we were hearing that every minority child had asthma. Why did they sudden — why was there an asthma epidemic amongst minority children? Because I’ll tell you why: The children got extra welfare if they were disabled, and they got extra help in school. It was a money racket. Everyone went in and was told [fake cough], “When the nurse looks at you, you go [fake cough], ‘I don’t know, the dust got me.’ ” See, everyone had asthma from the minority community. That was number one.

Now, the illness du jour is autism. You know what autism is? I’ll tell you what autism is. In 99 percent of the cases, it’s a brat who hasn’t been told to cut the act out. That’s what autism is.

What do you mean they scream and they’re silent? They don’t have a father around to tell them, “Don’t act like a moron. You’ll get nowhere in life. Stop acting like a putz. Straighten up. Act like a man. Don’t sit there crying and screaming, idiot.”

Autism — everybody has an illness. If I behaved like a fool, my father called me a fool. And he said to me, “Don’t behave like a fool.” The worst thing he said — “Don’t behave like a fool. Don’t be anybody’s dummy. Don’t sound like an idiot. Don’t act like a girl. Don’t cry.” That’s what I was raised with. That’s what you should raise your children with. Stop with the sensitivity training. You’re turning your son into a girl, and you’re turning your nation into a nation of losers and beaten men. That’s why we have the politicians we have.

Oh. My. God.  So apparently autistic kids are all really just brats and sissies.  Good to know – and be sure to share this revelation with any parents of autistic kids who you might know.  I’m sure they’ll appreciate it.

July 17th, 2008 at 06:39pm Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Media,Republicans,Wankers

Spamalanche!

Yes, I’m sure you’ve all missed the comment spam, so here’s some more to soothe your cravings.  (I would have done a photoblogging post, but I need to do some more processing first…)

damper intermingling towelling,McNeil portraits custodians …

unpleasantness!columnize MacMillan?requests?Hiroshi contestant …

Eli atrophic Flemish?… [OMG they’re personalizing them now!]

audiogram flatulent allegorically….

inferiority reprieve cracked?cowherd …

straightforwardness.warmly dictum copra!procurement drab …

addictions tasting feet decide eaten fighting …

Riga:burnishing?husks hoists …

microprocedures Hopkins adventured,injury …

treasuring comfortabilities?rephrase visas abler …

sticking betrayal deposits …

counselor responsibleness economists surrogate Saigon?…

shreds,copiousness guano cosmos bronzes,…

cask originators hash anechoic Waupaca Methuen …

gigahertz growers slight:wasp Cicero undirected,…

I think I’d better just stop there – I don’t think there’s any way I can top those last two.

July 17th, 2008 at 11:20am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Spamoptikon

Poor Adam Smith.

It really is classic Republicanism: Claim that regulation is oppressive and the free market is the only source of corporate accountability that we need, then rig the free market to remove the accountability.  Brilliant!

While the Republic burns due to the unsavory combination of incompetence, ideological rigidity, and crony capitalism, the fools and assclowns seem ever more determined to avoid any personal responsibility for the damages they have wrought. Instead, they flail about blindly, blaming everything and everyone — except their own horrific negligence.

(…)

As a nation, our institutions have failed us: Under Alan Greenspan, the Federal Reserve slept through the most reckless and irresponsible expansion of bank lending in history for reasons of ideological purity. His opposition to the Fed’s regulatory role reached the point of malfeasance long ago.  History is unlikely to be kind to the Maestro.

There is a choice to be made: Either we regulate the Banks, or leave it to the vagaries of the free markets to punish those who trade with, or place their assets in the wrong institutions. But for God’s sake, do not give us the worst of both worlds — do not allow banks the freedom to make horrific but preventable mistakes (i.e., only lending money to those who can pay it back), but then expect the taxpayers to foot the trillion dollar bill.

That’s not capitalism, its not socialism, its not regulation, and its sure as hell isn’t what free markets are. Our language is insufficient to describe this hodge-podge system, other than to call it a random patchwork of quasi-capitalism, quadrennial-socialism, and politics as usual. Ideological idiocy is the only phrase I can muster that has any resonance with the daily insanity.

(…)

Back in the States, something beyond cognitive dissonance is occurring — this is full blown case of dementia unfolding in the public sphere. When this era of excess and absurdity is treated by historians in the future, the question I expect to be asked most is not why many of these people weren’t jailed for their financial felonies. Rather, I expect them to wonder why so many of these folk weren’t placed in protective custody, and heavily medicated, for the only rational explanation for their statements and behaviors is that they have gone so far beyond the bend as to be completely and totally insane.

Massively over-leveraged companies? Blame short sellers.

Wildly under-capitalized financial firms? Blame rumors.

Heinously poor corporate management? Blame a Senator.

(…)

Books will be written about this period of time, and our descendants will wonder in awe as to how this was allowed to happen. Tulips got nothing on us! Its not just the total dollar value of the losses that have exceeded all other global fits of financial madness combined, but rather, how so many warning signs were so blithely ignored by so many and for so long. What was wrong with these people, the authors and historians will wonder. Did the antibiotics in the food supply drive them mad? Did the High Fructose Corn Syrup compromise their ability to think? Some form of viral plague? Roid rage? What else could have created such a mass delusion amongst not just the populace, but their leadership and institutions?

(…)

From beyond the grave, Adam Smith does not know whether to weep or retch.

I do have to disagree with the insanity-rather-than-criminality assessment, however.  These people are not insane, just greedy, selfish, short-sighted, and perfectly amoral.  And they’re running the show.

(h/t Ian)

July 17th, 2008 at 07:20am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Corruption/Cronyism,Economy,Republicans


Contact Eli





Feeds

Linkedelia!

Most Recent Posts

Archives

Categories

Calendar

July 2008
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  


Thinking Blogger

Pittsburgh Webloggers

Site Meter


View My Stats *