Archive for August 8th, 2008

Merry Olympicsmas!

In honor of the Olympics, I give you one of my all-time favorite MadTV sketches:

A video used to be embedded here but the service that it was hosted on has shut down.

Look at that plucky Barukian team go!

August 8th, 2008 at 10:19pm Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Monday Media Blogging,Sports

Will It Hurt?

Murray Waas thinks Republicans will pay a stiff electoral price for BushCo’s efforts to stonewall congressional oversight:

So at a minimum, the Justice Department is likely to release two devastating reports on the Bush administration this fall or earlier. Worse, we might also learn that Justice’s Inspector General has sought either a criminal probe of some officials or even a special prosecutor. (The Inspector General does not have prosecutorial powers.)

Add to that a potential prosecution of Bradley Schlozman, or more disclosures about what the federal grand jury probing Schlozman has been uncovering, and the political damage could reach a crescendo.

At that point, even if the motives of the Bush administration in being unyielding in its executive privilege claims are indeed only because of what they view to be a high minded defense of constitutional principles (Judge Bates’ opinion aside), the politics of continuing to do so might prove not only to be harmful to John McCain’s presidency, but devastating to the Repubican House and Senate candidates in the fall.

The continuous claims of executive privilege– whatever the motive for them being invoked– are going to appear more and more to the pubic part and parcel of a cover up. That is inevitable as the U.S. attorney report becomes public, and the report on the politicization of the Civil Rights Division is made public, as well as whatever else is learned about these issues through leaks from the federal grand jury, and whatever else is uncovered by the House Judiciary Committee and folks like Josh Marshall.


Right now, the executive privilege debate has been relegated to the back pages of newspapers and it might appear to be smart politics to stand tough in the face of congressional subpoenas.

But either in the fall or before, all of that is almost certain to dramatically change.

And claims of executive privilege by the President of the United States to disallow his top aides to testify on Capitol Hill could prove devastating to his own political party. Republican House and Senate candidates are no doubt going to be damaged by the executive privilege claims becoming a front and center issue just prior to the election.

In the end, the President’s continuing claim of executive privilege– whether made for high minded reasons of constitutional law, obstinacy, or for political calculation– could prove to be a last unwanted legacy that George Bush leaves behind for his own political party.

I absolutely agree that BushCo’s desperate clinging to unsupportable claims of executive privilege and absolute immunity is a tacit admission of guilt, but whether or not it affects this year’s elections hinges on at least three things:

1) Will the media report the reports?  And I mean on the front page and on TV, not just on page A22.

2) Have the voters become so jaded to Bush administration scandals that they just shrug and say, “Great, another one.  Just throw it on the pile”?

3) Can/will the Democrats successfully tie the Republican candidates to the Bush administration?  Trashing Dubya’s reputation is all well and good, but it won’t be very helpful if they allow Republican candidates – and the GOP brand in general – to back away from his criminality.

Frankly, I’m not hopeful.  But more than willing to be pleasantly surprised…

August 8th, 2008 at 11:38am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Bush,Constitution,Corruption/Cronyism,Elections,Politics,Republicans

So Much For That Idea…

You know the one: That senators and congresscritters in Republican states and districts have no choice but to be hawks and corporate shills, and we just have to grit our teeth and put up with it when they sell us out again and again.  (If you want to depress yourself, go here and filter on Senate Democrats, then sort in descending order by “Pres. Support.”)  Not so.  Check out the record of former red-state Senator Birch Bayh, father of milquetoast Senator Evan Bayh (who voted with Bush 57% of the time):

~ In 1962, narrowly won a Senate race in a big time red state against a Republican incumbent in 1962 through a “dynamic grassroots campaign”

~ helped draft and pass the 1964 Civil Rights Act and 1965 Voting Rights Act

~ led the effort to defeat Nixon’s appointment of two segregationist judges — Clement Hanyesworth and Harrold Carswell — to the Supreme Court

~ earned a place on the Nixon “enemies list” (I still am an avid fan, however, of Nixon’s foreign policy — and many of his domestic policies)

~ drafted and helped secure passage of the 25th Amendment to the Constitution establishing rules for presidential and vice-presidential succession

~ drafted and helped secure passage of the 26th Amendment lowering the voting age in the nation to 18 from 21 years of age

~ by drafting and passing two Amendments to the Constitution, Birch Bayh became the first American to author more than one amendment since the Founding Fathers

~ helped sponsor and nearly passed the Equal Rights Amendment that narrowly failed to secure ratification by the states

~ authored and helped secure passage of Title IX of the Higher Education Act that prohibited discrimination on the basis of gender in the classroom and athletic field

~ authored the original Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)

~ He was a co-author of the Bayh-Dole Act which allowed US universities, small businesses, and non-profit organizations to retain intellectual property rights of inventions developed from federal government-funded research — probably one of the most significant triggers of new university-based innovation in US history

Funny how none of that ever made him toxic to the Republican-leaning voters of Indiana.  Maybe integrity counts for something after all – I can think of some Democrats who should look into it.

Then again, maybe sellouts like Landrieu and the Nelsons aren’t selling out to win red states – maybe they’re just selling out to get paid, and using the redness of their states as an excuse.

August 8th, 2008 at 07:18am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Corruption/Cronyism,Democrats,Politics,Wankers

Contact Eli



Most Recent Posts




August 2008
« Jul   Sep »

Thinking Blogger

Pittsburgh Webloggers

Site Meter

View My Stats *