Archive for November, 2010

Wikileaks: Just Exactly Like Gawker

Just when I think Sarah Palin can’t possibly get any dumber…

“Inexplicable: I recently won in court to stop my book ‘America by Heart’ from being leaked, but US Govt can’t stop Wikileaks’ treasonous act?” Palin wrote on Twitter Monday morning, following the whistleblower site’s explosive publication of 250,000 classified documents.

Palin was referring to her own battle earlier this month against Gawker, which posted pages of her book online before its publication date.

Ah yes, of course.  Because a website located in America and subject to American laws is just exactly the same as a website which is, y’know, not.  Not to mention the fact that she didn’t prevent Gawker from leaking her book, she merely got them to take the excerpts down after they had already been posted for anyone to copy.

And my favorite part: Accusing a foreign website and a foreign national of treason.  Brilliant.

1 comment November 30th, 2010 at 07:39am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Blogosphere,Palin,Republicans,Wankers

America The Exceptional…ish

Bad enough that American exceptionalism is like a religion for conservatives, but it creeps me right out when they brag about it like it’s a good thing:

“This reorientation away from a celebration of American exceptionalism is misguided and bankrupt,” former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney writes in his campaign setup book, “No Apology: The Case For American Greatness.”

On Monday, Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.), who is also considering a White House bid, is scheduled to address the Detroit Economic Club on “Restoring American Exceptionalism: A Vision for Economic Growth and Prosperity.”

For former Alaska governor Sarah Palin, the concept is a frequent theme in her speeches, Facebook postings, tweets and appearances on Fox News Channel. Her just-published book, “America by Heart,” has a chapter titled “America the Exceptional.”

Newt Gingrich, the former House speaker, contends in his speeches that Obama’s views on the subject are “truly alarming.”

In an interview in August with Politico, former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee went so far as to declare of Obama: “His worldview is dramatically different than any president, Republican or Democrat, we’ve had. . . . To deny American exceptionalism is in essence to deny the heart and soul of this nation.”

And last week, Rick Santorum, the former senator from Pennsylvania, told a group of College Republicans at American University: “Don’t kid yourself with the lie. America is exceptional, and Americans are concerned that there are a group of people in Washington who don’t believe that any more.”

Now just replace the phrase “American exceptionalism” with its synonym, “reflexive, mindless jingoism,” and that should give you some feel for just how off-putting this is.

I understand the desire to have pride in your country, but by what metric is America exceptional right now?  Our economy is in the toilet, we have a massive trade deficit, we’re lagging the developed world in education and healthcare, our government is paralyzed and corrupt, we’re mired in two unwinnable wars, and our public discourse is flooded with rage, fear, hate and reality TV.  Unless you define exceptional in terms of military budget and insane wingnuts per capita, I just don’t see it.

America has become the Norma Desmond of nations.  We’re ready for our close-up, Mr. Gibbon.

November 29th, 2010 at 08:35pm Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Politics,Republicans,Wankers

Monday Media Blogging

The Palins’ rise to tabloid & reality TV celebrity, presented in inimitable Taiwanese CGI style.

Awesome as always.

November 29th, 2010 at 11:33am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Monday Media Blogging,Palin

Deficit Reduction News Flash

Apparently it is possible to reduce the deficit without screwing the poor, middle class, or the elderly.

Who knew?

I’m still not optimistic about the outcome, but it’s good to have some progressive alternatives out there so that Obama and the Republicans don’t get to pretend that the Bowles-Simpson plan and its Pete Peterson/Alice Rivlin siblings aren’t the only deficit-cutting strategies out there.

November 29th, 2010 at 07:25am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Democrats,Economy,Politics,Social Security

Sunday Mr. Deity Blogging

Mr. Deity and Larry discuss the implementation of free will.

Not being able to kill people with our thoughts: Bug or feature?

November 28th, 2010 at 02:13pm Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Monday Media Blogging,Mr. Deity,Religion

Friday Quote & Puppy/Kitten Blogging

This week’s quote is from the film noir classic Laura, which is notable for having a female lead named Gene and a male lead named Dana:

I can afford another blemish on my character, but not on my clothes.

And, of course, there’ll be other people’s puppies and kittens…

Too cute.

November 26th, 2010 at 01:25pm Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Friday Quote & Cat Blogging

Analogy For The Day

Watching the Obama administration in action (for want of a better word) is an awful lot like watching a bunch of cops standing around a bank robbery and saying “What a damn shame – somebody really oughta do something.”

3 comments November 24th, 2010 at 11:27am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Corruption/Cronyism,Democrats,Economy,Obama,Politics

The Liberation Of Christmas

Looks like the War On Christmas is almost over:

Randy Sharp, director-special projects at the AFA, said that in the past five years the group has seen the percentage of retailers recognizing Christmas in their advertising rise from 20 percent to 80 percent. Just eight retailers are left on the group’s list of “Companies Against Christmas.”

It’s also become more challenging to find a large, national retailer to single out for the group’s annual boycott. This year, Dick’s Sporting Goods, which boasts an online “Holiday Shop,” will be the target of the boycott. The AFA is expected to send an Action Alert to its 2.3 million supporters on Friday morning. That alert will urge shoppers to boycott Dick’s between now and Dec. 25. It also calls for consumers to e-mail President-Chief Operating Officer Joseph Schmidt and then call Chief Marketing Officer Jeff Hennion. The retailer declined to comment. In the past, Target, Sears, Gap and Walmart have been targets.

“We’ve had a complete flip,” Mr. Sharp says. “The politically correct holiday verbiage is going away. Companies are getting the message.”

Indeed, retailers that have found themselves the target of boycotts or media and consumer scrutiny have responded swiftly in recent years. Lowe’s “Family Trees” were renamed “Christmas Trees,” while Walmart’s “Holiday Shop” is now a “Christmas Shop.” Midway through the 2005 holiday season, Target, facing a boycott, announced its advertising messages would become more specific and include references to Christmas. And last year, Gap responded to a boycott by issuing a press release highlighting the use of the phrase “Merry Christmas” in its upcoming Old Navy ads.

Thank goodness, the retailers have finally been freed from the bullying and oppression of the PC police!  Now they can enjoy the same feeling of freedom that the Iraqis felt seven years ago!

November 23rd, 2010 at 11:26am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Religion,Republicans,Wankers

Sarah Palin Still Too Dumb To Realize How Dumb She Is

She still thinks Katie Couric was the problem…

Speaking to Fox New’s Sean Hannity in an interview to air Monday, Palin said she wants nothing to do with Katie Couric, the CBS Evening News anchor who’s line of questioning facilitated one of the most memorable political foibles of the 2008 presidential campaign.

“As for doing an interview, though, with a reporter who already has such a bias against whatever it is that I would come out and say? Why waste my time? No,” Palin told Hannity of Couric, according to excerpts obtained by Time’s Mark Halperin.

“I want to help clean up the state that is so sorry today of journalism. And I have a communications degree. I studied journalism, who, what, where, when, and why of reporting,” Palin continued. “I will speak to reporters who still understand that cornerstone of our democracy, that expectation that the public has for truth to be reported. And then we get to decide our own opinion based on the facts reported to us.”

“Does this reporter make my ass look stupid?”

“No, your stupid ass makes your ass look stupid.  And so does saying stuff like, ‘I want to help clean up the state that is so sorry today of journalism.’  Also.”

November 23rd, 2010 at 07:16am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Media,Palin,Politics,Republicans,Wankers

The Perfect Scam

The secret to avoiding Michael Chertoff’s Rapiscans?

Pay $180 for Michael Chertoff’s Clear ID!

Maybe he’s supplying the surgical grope-gloves too.  Boy, I sure am glad that the Bush era of cronyism and corruption is finally over…

November 22nd, 2010 at 07:07pm Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Corruption/Cronyism,Terrorism,Wankers

Monday Media Blogging

The opening of the hilariously bad 80s horror movie, Necropolis.  The best part of the movie starts at around 3 minute in or so (for context) – bear in mind that this scene supposedly takes place in the 17th century (NSFW).

Here’s the full playlist, for those who want to watch the whole gloriously cheesy epic.

November 22nd, 2010 at 11:21am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Monday Media Blogging,Movies

Friday Quote & Bunny Blogging

This week’s quote is from Angie – all I remember is that it stars Geena Davis…

In this world, the less broken have to take care of the more broken. I learned that from my son.

And, of course, there’ll be other people’s baby bunnies…


November 19th, 2010 at 11:26am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Friday Quote & Cat Blogging

This Just In

George Soros is not impressed:

According to multiple sources with knowledge of his remarks, Soros told those in attendance that he is “used to fighting losing battles but doesn’t like to lose without fighting.”

“We have just lost this election, we need to draw a line,” he said, according to several Democratic sources. “And if this president can’t do what we need, it is time to start looking somewhere else.”

No kidding.  Obama has shown nothing but contempt for peons like us, but maybe he’ll pay a little more attention to Democratic gazillionaires.  Maybe.

November 18th, 2010 at 07:29am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Democrats,Obama,Politics

Stay Classy, Palins!

Well, this is certainly charming…

During the premiere of “Sarah Palin’s Alaska” Sunday night — a boy named Tre who went to school with the Palin kids wrote a status update that read, “Sarah Palin’s Alaska, is failing so hard right now.”

The comment sparked an intense response from Willow — who replied on the boy’s wall, “Haha your so gay. I have no idea who you are, But what I’ve seen pictures of, your disgusting … My sister had a kid and is still hot.”

Willow followed up that comment with another that read, “Tre stfu. Your such a f**got.”


After more users began to gang up on the Palins, Willow dropped another message that read, “Sorry that you guys are all jealous of my families success and you guys aren’t goin to go anywhere with your lives.”

Hey, remember when Sensitive Mama Tolerance Grizzly wigged out over Rahm’s “fucking retarded” quote?

Just as we’d be appalled if any public figure of Rahm’s stature ever used the “N-word” or other such inappropriate language, Rahm’s slur on all God’s children with cognitive and developmental disabilities – and the people who love them – is unacceptable, and it’s heartbreaking.

What a lovely and enlightened sentiment.  Funny that she doesn’t seem to have a problem with her daughter using the word “faggot,” though.  Why, it’s almost as if slurs that can’t be applied to her own family members don’t count.  Or maybe she just doesn’t think gays are God’s children, or that anyone loves them.

(Cross-posted at MyFDL)

November 17th, 2010 at 09:42pm Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Palin,Wankers

Wednesday Media Blogging

Yeah, I know today should be Weekly World News, but this was just too good to wait, plus the WWN has been mostly right-wing crap for months now.

Here it is, the Taiwanese CGI people’s take on the new TSA security regime:

(h/t twolf)

November 17th, 2010 at 06:16pm Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Monday Media Blogging

Vertical Boston Building Photoblogging

Yep, more Boston building photos – but look, one of them’s in color!

* WPG2 Plugin Not Validated *

* WPG2 Plugin Not Validated *

* WPG2 Plugin Not Validated *

November 16th, 2010 at 11:25am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Photoblogging

Holiday Travel Tip

Always be sure to focus your groin before traveling by plane.

You’ll thank me.

November 16th, 2010 at 07:21am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Terrorism

More B&W Boston Building Photoblogging

All pictures of the same building, actually…

* WPG2 Plugin Not Validated *

* WPG2 Plugin Not Validated *

* WPG2 Plugin Not Validated *

1 comment November 15th, 2010 at 11:25am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Photoblogging

Monday Media Blogging

One of the great commercial moments from Ye Olden Tymes:

There I was, there I was, there I was… IN the Congo!

November 15th, 2010 at 07:11am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Monday Media Blogging

Friday Quote & OK Go Blogging

This week’s quote is from Spice World.  Yes, I watched it.  No, I don’t know why.

It is time to hang your pants on the hook of darkness, whether they’re clean or not.

And, of course, there’ll be other people’s OK Go with dogs…


1 comment November 12th, 2010 at 11:25am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Friday Quote & Cat Blogging,Monday Media Blogging

The Bowles-Simpson Deficit-Reduction Plan In A Nutshell

Screw the middle-class to fund goodies for the rich. I know, that never happens, right?

The goals of reform, as Mr. Bowles and Mr. Simpson see them, are presented in the form of seven bullet points. “Lower Rates” is the first point; “Reduce the Deficit” is the seventh.

So how, exactly, did a deficit-cutting commission become a commission whose first priority is cutting tax rates, with deficit reduction literally at the bottom of the list?

Actually, though, what the co-chairmen are proposing is a mixture of tax cuts and tax increases — tax cuts for the wealthy, tax increases for the middle class. They suggest eliminating tax breaks that, whatever you think of them, matter a lot to middle-class Americans — the deductibility of health benefits and mortgage interest — and using much of the revenue gained thereby, not to reduce the deficit, but to allow sharp reductions in both the top marginal tax rate and in the corporate tax rate.

It will take time to crunch the numbers here, but this proposal clearly represents a major transfer of income upward, from the middle class to a small minority of wealthy Americans. And what does any of this have to do with deficit reduction?

Let’s turn next to Social Security. There were rumors beforehand that the commission would recommend a rise in the retirement age, and sure enough, that’s what Mr. Bowles and Mr. Simpson do. They want the age at which Social Security becomes available to rise along with average life expectancy. Is that reasonable?

The answer is no, for a number of reasons — including the point that working until you’re 69, which may sound doable for people with desk jobs, is a lot harder for the many Americans who still do physical labor.

But beyond that, the proposal seemingly ignores a crucial point: while average life expectancy is indeed rising, it’s doing so mainly for high earners, precisely the people who need Social Security least. Life expectancy in the bottom half of the income distribution has barely inched up over the past three decades. So the Bowles-Simpson proposal is basically saying that janitors should be forced to work longer because these days corporate lawyers live to a ripe old age.

Way to hand-pick a pair of evil elitist bastards to chair your deficit commission, Mr. President.  I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone want a second term less.

2 comments November 12th, 2010 at 07:28am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Economy,Obama,Politics,Republicans,Wankers

Wednesday Why-I-Love-The-Weekly-World-News Blogging

Dubya sure does love his waterboarding:

George W. Bush reveals in his memoir, Decision Points, that he personally waterboarded VP Dick Cheney.


“Dick was so in favor of waterboarding, that I thought he should experience himself to see what it was like.  He thought it was a very effective tool.”  Bush went on to say that after waterboarding Cheney as a “test” he used it on two other occasion to get the Vice President to keep his mouth shut on certain issues.

“Dick was making me look bad a few times with the press. He was too arrogant.  So, I had to waterboard him to get him to shut his pie hole!”


Dick Cheney, who hasn’t read Bush’s book yet, said that “Bush went a bit overboard with the waterboard stuff.  He got a little waterboard crazy.  He wanted everybody waterboarded, Andy Card, Karl Rove… one day he even wanted Laura waterboarded.  I’m sure he’s waterboarding his staff in Crawford to keep them in line.”

Bush said that when he sees Cheney next month at a conservative conference in New Orleans, ‘I’d love to take an hour or so and waterboard Dick again.  I had so much fun waterboarding Dick.  It was a hoot!”

Bush said that he, personally, was never waterboarded, but “if I ever do anything wrong, I wouldn’t mind.  But I’ve never done anything wrong.  I have no regrets.”

I just hope there aren’t any photos of Dick Cheney naked, wearing nothing but a hood and some electrodes…

November 10th, 2010 at 11:25am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Bush,Cheney,Torture,Weekly World News

Something For CT To Look Forward To

Imagine having to choose between Linda McMahon and Joe Lieberman.

Would Lieberman try to win the Democratic nomination (unlikely the outcome would be any better than last time), or would he just go straight to an independent run again?  As an added bit of fun, the Connecticut For Lieberman Party has pretty much been taken over by people who aren’t exactly Lieberman fans, so he’d have to come up with a new imaginary party banner to run under.

My fondest hope is that the CFL actually runs ads against him.  What would be sweeter than seeing 27 seconds of Lieberman-bashing followed by “This message has been paid for by the Connecticut For Lieberman Party”?

November 10th, 2010 at 07:05am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Elections,Lieberman,Politics,Republicans

B&W Boston Overpass Photoblogging

Who among us does not love overpasses?

* WPG2 Plugin Not Validated *

* WPG2 Plugin Not Validated *

2 comments November 9th, 2010 at 11:29am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Photoblogging

Great Moments In Whitewash


The lead investigator for the presidential panel delving into the BP oil spill said on Monday that he had found no evidence that anyone involved in drilling the doomed well had taken safety shortcuts to save money.

Fred H. Bartlit Jr., a prominent trial lawyer hired to lead the panel’s inquiry, disputed the findings of other investigators, including plaintiffs’ lawyers and members of Congress, who have charged that BP and its main partners, Transocean and Halliburton, had cut corners to speed completion of the well, which cost $1.5 million a day to drill.

“To date we have not seen a single instance where a human being made a conscious decision to favor dollars over safety,” Mr. Bartlit said on Monday as he opened a detailed presentation on the causes of the April 20 disaster on a drilling rig off the Louisiana coast, which killed 11 workers and led to the biggest offshore oil spill in American history. “They want to be efficient, they don’t want to waste money, but they also don’t want to get their buddies killed.”

Really? None at all?

The only charitable conclusion I can draw is that when Bartlit says stuff like “we have not seen a single instance where a human being made a conscious decision to favor dollars over safety,” he means that favoring dollars over safety is institutional corporate policy.  That I could buy.

November 9th, 2010 at 07:26am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Corruption/Cronyism,Energy,Environment,Obama,Wankers

Monday Media Blogging

The financial crisis, as explained (surprisingly well) by insane Taiwanese CGI:

November 8th, 2010 at 11:29am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Corruption/Cronyism,Economy,Monday Media Blogging

Nice Try.

CAP’s Bracken Hendricks attempts to make the case for addressing climate change in the right’s own terms:

I worry that conservatives’ lock-step posture on climate change is seriously out of step with their professed priorities. A strong defense of our national interests, rigorous cost-benefit analysis, fiscal discipline and the ability to avoid unnecessary intrusions into personal liberty will all be seriously compromised in a world marked by climate change.

In fact, far from being conservative, the Republican stance on global warming shows a stunning appetite for risk. When faced with uncertainty and the possibility of costly outcomes, smart businessmen buy insurance, reduce their downside exposure and protect their assets. When confronted with a disease outbreak of unknown proportions, front-line public health workers get busy producing vaccines, pre-positioning supplies and tracking pathogens. And when military planners assess an enemy, they get ready for a worst-case encounter.

When it comes to climate change, conservatives are doing none of this. Instead, they are recklessly betting the farm on a single, best-case scenario: That the scientific consensus about global warming will turn out to be wrong. This is bad risk management and an irresponsible way to run anything, whether a business, an economy or a planet.

This is all true, but the problem is that conservatives’ nonchalance and outright denial of the risk of global warming doesn’t contradict their approach to economic, health, or military risk: it mirrors it.

Conservatives are only risk-averse in theory – in practice, their operating principle is to grab a buck and score a political point whenever they can and damn the consequences.  Not only that, but if global warming can’t be fixed using their toolkit of tax cuts for the rich, spending cuts for everyone else, or invading someone, they really can’t be bothered.

(Cross-posted at MyFDL)

November 8th, 2010 at 07:02am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Economy,Environment,Politics,Republicans

Sunday Mr. Deity Blogging

Luci is decidedly underwhelmed with the roles Mr. Deity has to offer.

November 7th, 2010 at 03:20pm Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Monday Media Blogging,Mr. Deity,Religion

Friday Quote & Hyrax Blogging

This week’s quote is from the amazing Dexter Gordon jazz movie, ‘Round Midnight:

It’d be the greatest city in the world, if I could just find some okra.

Mmm, okra…

And, of course, there’ll be other people’s hyraxes…

* WPG2 Plugin Not Validated *

* WPG2 Plugin Not Validated *

With free bonus alpaca!

November 5th, 2010 at 11:20am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Friday Quote & Cat Blogging,La Jolla/San Diego,Photoblogging

Great Moments In Irony

The Blue Dogs’ own opposition to effective stimulus and financial reform led directly to the Republican wave which cut them in half.  (And I’m guessing that their opposition to the public option and support for the Stupak Amendment didn’t help them much either.)

And it couldn’t have happened to a nicer bunch of corporatist wankers.  Too bad it had to result in the ascendancy of even bigger corporate wankers.  Johann Hari sums it up nicely:

This is the story of the modern Republican Party. They use the cultural signifiers of the good people of Middle America to get their emotional identification, meanwhile they pillage Middle America and redistribute its wealth to the rich….

This is all made easy for Republicans by the fact that most of the Democratic Party slithers in the same trough of corruption, begging from the same billionaires and corporations, and so can deliver only a tiny notch more for ordinary Americans. This makes left-liberal ideas look discredited, when in truth they are largely discarded.

Unless and until we get some kind of robust public campaign financing, this is just going to get worse and worse.  The Democrats’ own corporate corruption has essentially given the GOP license to run even further and further to the right, secure in the knowledge that the other side is too compromised to truly oppose them.

November 5th, 2010 at 07:20am Posted by Eli

Entry Filed under: Corruption/Cronyism,Democrats,Economy,Elections,Politics,Wankers

Previous Posts

Contact Eli



Most Recent Posts




November 2010
« Oct   Dec »

Thinking Blogger

Pittsburgh Webloggers

Site Meter

View My Stats *